Engineer Identification Test
Since I know so many Engineers (mentioning no names here!)
Straighten it.
SOCIAL SKILLS
Engineers have different objectives when it comes
to social interaction. "Normal" people expect to
accomplish several unrealistic things from social
interaction: Stimulating and thought-provoking
conversation Important social contacts A feeling
of connectedness with other humans In contrast to
"normal" people, engineers have rational
objectives for social interactions: Get it over
with as soon as possible Avoid getting invited to
something unpleasant Demonstrate mental
superiority and mastery of all subjects.
FASCINATION WITH GADGETS
To the engineer, all matter in the universe can be
placed into one of two categories: (1) things that
need to be fixed, and (2) things that will need to
be fixed after you've had a few minutes to play
with them. Engineers like to solve problems. If
there are no problems handily available, they will
create their own problems. Normal people don't
understand this concept; they believe that if it
ain't broke, don't fix it. Engineers believe that
if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features
yet. No engineer looks at a television remote
control without wondering what it would take to
turn it into a stun gun. No engineer can take a
shower without wondering if some sort of Teflon
coating would make showering unnecessary. To the
engineer, the world is a toy box full of
sub-optimized and feature-poor toys.
FASHION AND APPEARANCE
Clothes are the lowest priority for an engineer,
assuming the basic thresholds for temperature and
decency have been satisfied. If no appendages are
freezing or sticking together, and if no genitalia
or mammary glands are swinging around in plain
view, then the objective of clothing has been met.
Anything else is a waste.
DATING AND SOCIAL LIFE
Dating is never easy for engineers. A normal
person will employ various indirect and
duplicitous methods to create a false impression
of attractiveness. Engineers are incapable of
placing appearance above function.
Fortunately, engineers have an ace in the hole.
They are widely recognized as superior marriage
material: intelligent, dependable, employed,
honest, and handy around the house. While it's
true that many normal people would prefer not to
date an engineer, most normal people harbor an
intense desire to mate with them, thus producing
engineer like children who will have high-paying
jobs long before losing their virginity.
Male engineers reach their peak of sexual
attractiveness later than normal men, becoming
irresistible erotic dynamos in their mid thirties
to late forties. Just look at these examples of
sexually irresistible men in technical
professions:
Bill Gates
Female engineers become irresistible at the age of
consent and remain that way until about thirty
minutes after their clinical death. Longer if it's
a warm day.
HONESTY
Engineers are always honest in matters of
technology and human relationships. That's why
it's a good idea to keep engineers away from
customers, romantic interests, and other people
who can't handle the truth.
Engineers sometimes bend the truth to avoid work.
They say things that sound like lies but
technically are not because nobody could be
expected to believe them. The complete list of
engineer lies is listed below.
"I won't change anything without asking you
first." "I'll return your hard-to-find cable
tomorrow." "I have to have new equipment to do my
job." "I'm not jealous of your new computer."
FRUGALITY
Engineers are notoriously frugal. This is not
because of cheapness or mean spirit; it is simply
because every spending situation is simply a
problem in optimization, that is, "How can I
escape this situation while retaining the greatest
amount of cash?"
POWERS OF CONCENTRATION
If there is one trait that best defines an
engineer it is the ability to concentrate on one
subject to the complete exclusion of everything
else in the environment. This sometimes causes
engineers to be pronounced dead prematurely. Some
funeral homes in high-tech areas have started
checking resumes before processing the bodies.
Anybody with a degree in electrical engineering or
experience in computer programming is propped up
in the lounge for a few days just to see if he or
she snaps out of it.
RISK
Engineers hate risk. They try to eliminate it
whenever they can. This is understandable, given
that when an engineer makes one little mistake the
media will treat it like it's a big deal or
something.
EXAMPLES OF BAD PRESS FOR ENGINEERS
Hindenberg
RISK: Public humiliation and the death of
thousands of innocent people. REWARD: A
certificate of appreciation in a handsome plastic
frame.
Being practical people, engineers evaluate this
balance of risks and rewards and decide that risk
is not a good thing. The best way to avoid risk is
by advising that any activity is technically
impossible for reasons that are far too
complicated to explain.
If that approach is not sufficient to halt
project, then the engineer will fall back to a
second line of defense: "It's technically possible
but it will cost too much."
EGO
Ego-wise, two things are important to engineers:
How smart they are. How many cool devices they
own. The fastest way to get an engineer to solve a
problem is to declare that the problem is
unsolvable. No engineer can walk away from an
unsolvable problem until it's solved. No illness
or distraction is sufficient to get the engineer
off the case. These types of challenges quickly
become personal -- a battle between the engineer
and the laws of nature.
Engineers will go without food and hygiene for
days to solve a problem. (Other times just because
they forgot.) And when they succeed in solving the
problem they will experience an ego rush that is
better than sex -- and I'm including the kind of
sex where other people are involved.
Nothing is more threatening to the engineer than
the suggestion that somebody has more technical
skill. Normal people sometimes use that knowledge
as a lever to extract more work from the engineer.
When an engineer says that something can't be done
(a code phrase that means it's not fun to do),
some clever normal people have learned to glance
at the engineer with a look of compassion and pity
and say something along these lines: "I'll ask Bob
to figure it out. He knows how to solve difficult
technical problems." At that point it is a good
idea for the normal person to not stand between
the engineer and the problem. The engineer will
set upon the problem like a starved Chihuahua on a
pork chop.
You walk into a room and notice that a picture is
hanging crooked. You...
Ignore it.
Buy a CAD system and spend the next six months
designing a solar- powered, self-adjusting picture
frame while often stating aloud your belief that
the inventor of the nail was a total moron. The
correct answer is "3" but partial credit can be
given to anybody who writes "It depends" in the
margin of the test or simply blames the whole
stupid thing on "Marketing."
MacGyver
Etcetera
Space Shuttle Challenger
SPANet(tm)
Hubble space telescope
Apollo 13
Titanic
Ford Pinto
Corvair
The risk/reward calculation for engineers looks
something like this:
With Thanks to Yogesh. N.B. I didn't write this, and this came to me
from an engineer! It's a joke okay, so please do zap me with your
laser!